Summarize with

vs

GenLook

TryPoint vs GenLook:
AI virtual try-on for Shopify compared

An honest comparison of output quality, features, pricing and privacy, to help Shopify fashion merchants pick the right virtual try-on app.

Free plan and free trial available
Start Free
Free plan and free trial available
Published:  Jul 29, 2026
Updated:  Jul 30, 2026
8 min read

TL;DR — QUICK VERDICT

Quick verdict: TryPoint vs GenLook

Published by TryPoint. TryPoint is the product on the left, and this page is written by the company that sells it. Every GenLook figure below comes from its public Shopify App Store listing, checked on 29 July 2026.

TryPoint and GenLook are both Shopify-native AI virtual try-on apps for fashion, and both open at $19.99 a month for 100 try-ons. What separates them is what happens after the shopper sees the garment on their own body.

Choose TryPoint if the try-on should also grow an owned email list into Klaviyo, collect usage rights so shopper try-ons become consented social proof, become shoppable AI video UGC through VideoPoint, run across every product card rather than only the product page, and report its own conversion rate and ROI. Choose GenLook if the store needs a widget language outside TryPoint's twelve, runs close to 250 try-ons a month where its $29 tier is cheaper, or weights a larger App Store review count heavily.

Best for: an owned list, consented content and tracked ROI

GenLook

Best for: 47-language reach and 250 try-ons a month

SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON

Comparison overview

Feature-by-feature breakdown across try-on accuracy, UGC capabilities, and Shopify performance.

Criteria
GenLook
Try-on accuracy and realism
Built for accuracy on the categories that break other apps: swimwear, lingerie, open-cut, layering, prints and straps
GenLook
"AI-powered" try-on. The core model is not named on the listing
Garment categories supported
Tops, dresses, swimwear, outerwear, open-back, sheer and open-front. Upper body; not footwear or accessories
GenLook
Clothing. The listing does not specify handling for swimwear, intimates or layered pieces
Underlying AI technology
Latest Google virtual try-on model, kept current through the Google for Startups programme
GenLook
Not named on the listing. Nano Banana appears in its integrations list
Free plan
20 try-ons one-time, then pay-as-you-go keeps the widget live with no subscription
GenLook
10 try-ons per month, recurring
Starting price
$19.99/mo for 100 try-ons, $0.19 per extra try-on
GenLook
$19.99/mo for 100 try-ons, $0.17 per extra try-on
Cost per try-on at scale
$0.10 on Grow at $99.99/mo for 1,000 try-ons
GenLook
$0.10 on Pro at $99/mo for 1,000 try-ons
Pricing model
Free, pay-as-you-go at $0.29 per try-on, then two monthly tiers
GenLook
Free, then three monthly tiers. No pay-as-you-go option
Setup time
Minutes. Shopify app block, no theme code, works from existing product photos
GenLook
Minutes. Try-on button added to product pages
Built for Shopify badge
Yes
GenLook
Yes
Shopify App Store rating
5.0 from 6 reviews
GenLook
5.0 from 35 reviews
GDPR documentation
Photos deleted within 24 hours by default, never used to train AI. DPA, retention policy and shopper deletion rights published
GenLook
GDPR-documented: DPA available, sub-processors listed. Photos deleted after up to 7 days by default, configurable to 1 or 3, per its privacy policy
Support
Email on all plans, chat from Basic, 24/7 chat and a dedicated Slack channel on Grow
GenLook
Standard support on Starter and Growth, VIP support on Pro
Widget languages
12 languages, including right-to-left Hebrew
GenLook
47 languages
Usage rights and consented gallery
Yes. Permission requested at the try-on, consented gallery in Shopify Admin with satisfaction scores
GenLook
Not described on the listing
Try-on to shoppable video UGC
Yes, through VideoPoint in the same Shopify workspace
GenLook
No
Best for
Shopify fashion brands that want the try-on to grow an owned list, produce consented social proof, and report its own ROI
GenLook
Stores selling across many languages, or running about 250 try-ons a month

Last verified: 29 July 2026. GenLook pricing, ratings, languages and features taken from its Shopify App Store listing and genlook.app, checked the same day. Plans and features change, so verify on the listing before deciding. Found an error? Email k@videopoint.ai

5.0

on Shopify

AI Try-On for Fashion

More sales, fewer returns. Shoppers see how your clothes look on them before buying.

Start Free
Free plan and free trial available

THE SYSTEM

What happens after the shopper sees the garment on themselves?

Both apps generate a try-on image. What each one does with that moment is where they separate.

TryPoint treats the try-on as the front door, not the product. The same session captures an email into Klaviyo, Yotpo, Shopify Email, Mailchimp or Omnisend, asks the shopper for usage rights, drops consented try-ons into a social-proof gallery the merchant can publish, collects satisfaction feedback, and reports the conversion and ROI it produced. With VideoPoint, the best try-ons become shoppable AI video UGC on the product page.

GenLook

GenLook captures shopper emails and reports engagement analytics on button usage. Its Shopify App Store listing lists AI try-on, easy setup, lead capture, engagement analytics and a customizable widget. It does not describe a usage-rights request, a consented social-proof gallery, or video output.

Choose TryPoint if:

one app should grow the list, produce content the brand owns, and report its own ROI

Choose GenLook if:

email capture into Klaviyo is the only signal needed after a try-on

REALISM

Which one holds up on swimwear, lingerie and detailed garments?

The hard categories are where try-on apps get uninstalled. Filters refuse to generate, or the body gets warped to force a result.

TryPoint is built for accuracy on the categories that break other try-on apps: swimwear, lingerie, open-cut and layered pieces, prints, straps and structured silhouettes. It runs on the latest AI, kept current through the Google for Startups programme, and works from existing 2D product photography with no 3D assets or reshoots. Merchant reviews on the Shopify App Store from LeBeautiful and Bayeas name output realism as the reason they picked it.

GenLook

GenLook describes itself as AI virtual try-on that lets customers see clothes on themselves, and lists Nano Banana among its integrations. Its listing carries 35 five-star reviews, including one from an independent designer praising rendering of complex shapes and intricate detail. The core try-on model is not named on the listing.

Choose TryPoint if:

the catalogue includes swimwear, intimates, sheer or heavily detailed pieces where other apps distort or refuse

Choose GenLook if:

the catalogue is mainstream apparel and rendering the hard categories is not a requirement

Live Demo
See Virtual Try-On 

in Action

Paste a Shopify product URL, add your photo, and watch the product on you 

in seconds.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

REACH

Where does the try-on actually appear on the store?

Most try-on apps live on one surface: the product detail page. That caps how many shoppers ever see the button.

TryPoint runs the try-on across the whole store. The button appears on every product card in collection grids, on the home page, and in search and related-product widgets, not only on the product detail page. Shoppers can try on from anywhere they browse, which raises the number of sessions that start before a shopper ever opens a product page.

GenLook

GenLook installs a try-on button on product pages. Its listing describes adding a Try-On button to product pages, with a customizable widget matched to brand colours and style.

Choose TryPoint if:

collection and home-page traffic should convert without forcing every shopper into a product page first

Choose GenLook if:

the product detail page is the only surface where try-on matters

CONTENT RIGHTS

Can the merchant reuse a shopper try-on as social proof?

A try-on photo is either a one-time event or a content asset. The difference is whether the app ever asks for permission.

TryPoint asks the shopper for usage rights at the try-on moment. Granted images land in a consented gallery in Shopify Admin alongside satisfaction scores, where the merchant approves or rejects each one before it is reused as social proof on product pages, in email and in ads. Consent is revocable per try-on, and withdrawal purges the image automatically.

GenLook

GenLook's Shopify App Store listing describes lead capture and engagement analytics. It does not describe a permission-based usage-rights request, a consented gallery in Shopify Admin, or a social-proof display surface for try-on images.

Choose TryPoint if:

the try-on budget has to be defended on a recurring basis with attributed revenue and a calculated ROI

Choose GenLook if:

content production is handled elsewhere and try-on only needs to capture a lead

5.0

on Shopify

AI Try-On for Fashion

More sales, fewer returns. Shoppers see how your clothes look on them before buying.

Start Free
Free plan and free trial available

MEASUREMENT

Which one shows whether try-on is paying for itself?

Every try-on app reports usage. Far fewer report money.

TryPoint tracks an eight-stage funnel from widget load to completed order: loaded, viewed, clicked, uploaded, generated, shared, added to cart, ordered, with per-step drop-off and product-level breakdown. On top of it, the dashboard reports try-on conversion rate, attributed revenue, and ROI against the subscription cost, so the answer to whether try-on is paying for itself is a figure on screen rather than a spreadsheet exercise.

GenLook

GenLook lists an Analytics Dashboard on Starter and Advanced Analytics on Growth and Pro. Its own site describes the funnel as impressions, opens, uploads, generations and add-to-cart events, a funnel that ends at the cart. Neither the listing nor the site describes attributed order revenue or a calculated ROI figure, so proving payback stays a manual exercise.

Choose TryPoint if:

the try-on budget has to be defended on a recurring basis with attributed revenue and a calculated ROI

Choose GenLook if:

the try-on budget has to be defended on a recurring basis with attributed revenue and a calculated ROI

WHERE GENLOOK WINS

What does GenLook do better than TryPoint?

Three areas where GenLook is the stronger pick as of 29 July 2026. Verified on its Shopify App Store listing the same day.

TryPoint's widget ships in 12 languages, including right-to-left Hebrew. Its ladder is Free, then pay-as-you-go at $0.29 per try-on, then Basic at $19.99 for 100 and Grow at $99.99 for 1,000, with no tier between them. It carries a 5.0 rating from 6 reviews on the Shopify App Store.

GenLook

GenLook's widget ships in 47 languages against TryPoint's 12, an edge for stores selling in languages outside that set. Its $29 Growth tier covers 250 try-ons a month and is materially cheaper than TryPoint at that volume, with an entry overage of $0.17 against TryPoint's $0.19. It carries a 5.0 rating from 35 reviews, roughly six times TryPoint's review count, since launching on 26 September 2025.

Choose TryPoint if:

the twelve widget languages cover the store's markets and the value sits in the list, the consented content and the ROI reporting

Choose GenLook if:

the store needs a widget language outside TryPoint's twelve, runs close to 250 try-ons a month, or weights third-party review density heavily when picking a vendor

Kostas Zhukov

Founder & CEO at TouchPoints Inc. – TryPoint & VideoPoint

Building TryPoint, the AI virtual try-on for Shopify fashion, and VideoPoint, its AI video sibling. 15+ years in e-commerce across tech and DTC ventures. Led business development at MultiShip (acquired by a Big Tech company), scaling paying customers from 20 to 1,000 in 18 months. Writes about AI-native commerce and conversion.

BEYOND THE TRY-ON

Five things TryPoint does that GenLook does not

The try-on picture is the part both apps have. These are the parts that decide whether it pays for itself.

01

Shoppable AI video UGC, with VideoPoint

Consented try-ons can be turned into shoppable AI video UGC through VideoPoint inside the same Shopify workspace, then placed on the product page as purchasable content. No other Shopify try-on app closes this loop, which means every other option needs a separate video tool, a separate shoppable widget, and no data connection between the two.

02

Try-on across the whole store

The try-on runs on every product card, plus collection and home pages, not only the product detail page. GenLook's button installs on product pages, per its listing. Shoppers can start a try-on from anywhere they browse rather than only after they commit to opening a product.

03

Usage rights and a consented gallery

Shoppers are asked for usage rights on their own try-on. Approved images collect in a gallery in Shopify Admin with satisfaction scores attached, ready to publish as social proof on product pages, in email and in ads. Consent is revocable and withdrawal purges the image. GenLook's listing describes lead capture and engagement analytics, not a usage-rights flow.

04

A funnel that ends at the order, with ROI

GenLook's own site describes its funnel as impressions, opens, uploads, generations and add-to-cart. TryPoint's funnel runs to the completed order: eight stages with per-step drop-off, attributed revenue, and ROI against the subscription cost, per product.

05

Pay-as-you-go pricing

GenLook's ladder is monthly tiers only. TryPoint adds pay-as-you-go at $0.29 per try-on: no subscription, cost tracks actual usage, and the widget stays live through seasonal dips and long evaluations.

Ready to switch? Most brands are live within 24 hours — no developer needed.

Most brands are live within 24 hours.

Testimonials

What fashion brands have to say.

“The most accurate try-on we tested, by far”

I've tried basically every virtual try-on app on the Shopify App Store, and TryPoint is the most accurate by far. The fit and drape feel more believable, the visuals are cleaner, and the results look premium instead of "AI-ish." When I asked how they do it, it turns out they're in the Google for Startups program, using the most up-to-date Google try-on models. For a swimwear wholesaler, realism matters, and TryPoint's images came out far beyond expectations, genuinely miles ahead of anything else I found.

Roger Hall

Roger Hall

Co-Founder, COEGA Sunwear

Company logo

“Real photos, not AI – better conversion, fewer returns”

We sell sexy, open-style outfits, so virtual try-on has always been a struggle. Most apps either refuse to generate anything because of sensitivity filters, or they warp the body and skew the garment until everything looks artificial and cringe. TryPoint blew past our expectations. The try-ons actually look like real photos, not AI, the garments stay accurate, and it's something we can confidently put in front of customers. Since adding it, we've seen more buyer confidence, better conversion, and fewer returns.

Devon Griffith

Devon Griffith

Founder, LeBeautiful.co

Company logo

“Back-view try-on shipped in two days”

TryPoint is the first virtual try-on I've tested that's moving in the right direction fast. What sold me was the speed of execution and how responsive the team is to merchant feedback. I asked for back-view try-on because front-only isn't enough for apparel, and they shipped it in 2 days, already running the latest Google try-on model. That kind of cadence is rare. They also think about the full conversion journey, not just the cool demo. It feels built with merchants, not just for them.

Kimiko Williams

Kimiko Williams

Founder & Creative Director, Blade Infiniti

Company logo

“The only try-on that handled our bikini styles”

I tested a bunch of virtual try-on apps and most couldn't handle my bikini styles. Between content restrictions and how open the garments are, the results were blocked, distorted, or just looked awkward. TryPoint was the exception. It handled even the challenging pieces, and the output looked natural, not "AI-ish." Even when customers upload a regular, casual photo, the try-on comes out clean and believable, and the garment details stay accurate. It's the first one that feels genuinely usable for real commerce.

Randy Hodges

Randy Hodges

Owner, SoHot Swimwear

Company logo

SWITCHING IS EASY

Move from GenLook to TryPoint in 5 steps

About 15 minutes end to end. No data migration, no developer, no theme code.

01

Install TryPoint

Add TryPoint from the Shopify App Store. One-click install, no theme code. The free plan covers 20 try-ons with no card required, which is enough to judge output on real products before switching anything off.

02

Add the try-on block

Activate the TryPoint app block in the Online Store 2.0 editor. It pulls product images straight from the existing Shopify catalogue, so there are no reshoots, no cutouts and no 3D assets to prepare.

03

Match the button to the theme

Set the button style, colour and label to match the theme, and choose whether the try-on runs on every product, selected collections, or specific products. Live preview updates as the settings change.

04

Reconnect the email flow

Point the captured emails and marketing consent at Klaviyo, Yotpo, Shopify Email, Mailchimp or Omnisend. Any GenLook to Klaviyo automation maps across directly, so list growth continues without a gap.

05

Turn on usage rights, then uninstall GenLook

Enable the usage-rights request and satisfaction feedback so consented try-ons start filling the gallery from day one, then remove GenLook. Try-on history is shopper-side and settings are app-specific, so nothing needs exporting and the ROI dashboard reads cleanly from a fresh event stream.

Ready to switch? Most brands are live within 24 hours — no developer needed.

Most brands are live within 24 hours.

FAQ

Questions people ask before they hit “Start Free”.

What is the main difference between TryPoint and GenLook?

Both are Shopify-native AI virtual try-on apps for fashion, and both open at $19.99 a month for 100 try-ons, so the difference is not the try-on picture. GenLook generates the try-on, captures a lead and reports engagement analytics. TryPoint treats the try-on as the start of a system: the same session grows an owned email list into Klaviyo, Yotpo, Shopify Email, Mailchimp or Omnisend, asks the shopper for usage rights so the image can become consented social proof, can become shoppable AI video UGC through VideoPoint, runs across every product card rather than only the product page, and reports its own conversion rate, attributed revenue and ROI in the dashboard. On widget languages TryPoint ships 12, including right-to-left Hebrew; GenLook reaches further with 47.

Is TryPoint or GenLook cheaper?

GenLook is cheaper at most volumes, and the page says so because the arithmetic is public on both listings. At 100 try-ons a month the two are identical at $239.88 for the year. At 250 a month GenLook's $29 Growth tier runs $348 against TryPoint's $581.88. At 500 a month it is $708 against $1,151.88. At 1,000 a month the gap closes to $1,188 against $1,199.88, which is under $12 across a full year. TryPoint is the cheaper option for variable or seasonal volume, where pay-as-you-go at $0.29 a try-on removes the monthly commitment GenLook does not offer. Pay-as-you-go also answers the evaluation question: when the 20 free try-ons run out, the widget stays live for cents per try-on with no subscription started, so testing continues at whatever pace the store's real traffic sets. All figures use published list pricing on both Shopify App Store listings as of 29 July 2026.

Does TryPoint work on swimwear, intimates or sensitive cuts?

Yes, and this is where most try-on apps in the category fall down. Many run aggressive content filters that either refuse to generate a try-on for a revealing garment or warp the body to force a result, producing output no brand would put in front of a customer. TryPoint handles bikinis, one-pieces, lingerie and open-cut styles without refusing or distorting, and it holds prints, straps and layered pieces rather than reinterpreting them. Merchant reviews on the TryPoint Shopify App Store listing from LeBeautiful and Bayeas name exactly this as the reason they chose it. Transparent and sheer fabrics remain the hardest case across the whole category, and that is worth testing on your own products during the free plan before committing.

Is TryPoint GDPR-compliant, and how long are shopper photos kept?

Yes. Shopper photos are processed only to generate the try-on image and are deleted within 24 hours by default, and they are never used to train any AI model. An explicit consent screen appears before any upload, so the shopper knows what happens to the photo before it leaves the device. TryPoint publishes a Data Processing Agreement, a retention policy and shopper deletion rights, which is usually what a legal team asks for when a store sells into the EU, and the try-on works on the garment rather than facial mapping. GenLook documents GDPR properly too: a DPA through its terms, named sub-processors, and photos deleted after up to 7 days by default, configurable down to 1, per its privacy policy. The difference is the default window. A try-on photo is intimate data, and GDPR's storage-limitation principle points at the shortest retention that does the job: the try-on itself generates in seconds, so the photo has no reason to sit on a server for days. TryPoint deletes within 24 hours on every store with nothing to configure.

Does virtual try-on actually reduce returns?

The honest answer is that the evidence is mixed, and most of the numbers circulating in this category come from vendors with something to sell. What is well supported is that showing a shopper how a garment will look on their own body raises confidence, and confidence raises conversion. TryPoint does not publish a headline return-reduction percentage, because a borrowed figure will not survive a merchant's own test. Instead the dashboard reports what can actually be measured on each individual store: try-on rate, add-to-cart from try-on, orders from try-on, attributed revenue and ROI against the subscription cost. One expectation worth setting: try-on shows how a garment looks, and the size guide tells the shopper how it fits. Vendors claiming their AI predicts a size are overclaiming, and Google's own virtual try-on documentation says the same.

Summarize with

FINAL VERDICT

TryPoint vs GenLook: the recommendation

Both apps render a garment onto a shopper's photo, and at the entry tier both charge the same for it. The real decision is whether the try-on should end as an image, or turn into a list, consented content and a number a merchant can defend a budget with.

Choose TryPoint if...

  • The catalogue includes swimwear, lingerie, sheer or heavily detailed pieces where other try-on apps distort or refuse to generate
  • Every try-on should grow an owned email list into Klaviyo, Yotpo, Shopify Email, Mailchimp or Omnisend at the highest-intent moment on the page
  • Shopper try-ons should become consented social proof the brand owns, reviewed in Shopify Admin before anything is published
  • The best try-ons should become shoppable AI video UGC through VideoPoint, inside the same Shopify workspace
  • The try-on should run on every product card, collection and home page rather than only the product detail page
  • The try-on budget has to be justified with attributed revenue and a calculated ROI rather than an engagement chart
  • Volume is seasonal or unpredictable and pay-as-you-go at $0.29 a try-on beats a monthly commitment

Choose GenLook if...

  • The store needs a widget language outside TryPoint's twelve, where GenLook's 47-language coverage reaches further
  • Monthly volume sits near 250 try-ons, where the $29 Growth tier costs $348 a year against TryPoint's $581.88
  • Cost is the deciding factor at 500 try-ons a month, where GenLook runs roughly $444 cheaper across the year
  • A larger App Store review count carries real weight in the vendor decision, at 35 reviews against 6
  • Lead capture into Klaviyo is the only signal needed after a try-on, with content and video handled elsewhere
  • A recurring monthly free allowance of 10 try-ons suits the evaluation better than 20 one-time